What Happened on the Moon? – An Investigation Into Apollo, 2 DVD Special Edition
Description
“If some of the film was spoiled, it’s remotely possible they [NASA] may have shot some scenes in a studio environment to avoid embarrassment.” – David Groves, PhD. This compelling video throws into serious doubt the authenticity of the Apollo missions and features information that challenges the declared abilities of NASA to successfully send a man to the Moon and return him safely to Earth. New evidence clearly suggests that NASA hoaxed pictures allegedly taken on the… More >>
What Happened on the Moon? – An Investigation Into Apollo, 2 DVD Special Edition
Tagged with: Apollo • Edition • Happened • Into • Investigation • Moon • Special
Filed under: Conspiracy
Like this post? Subscribe to my RSS feed and get loads more!
This is a very detailed investigation on how we could not have gone to the moon. It is amazing how many fairy tails we are expected to swallow and believe as fact. And we are to curse anyone who, using logic and facts exposes the truth.
Rating: 5 / 5
I can no longer believe anything that the main stream media or government says. It is so obvious that the pictures from the moon were faked. The radiation problems are so immense that it is no wonder that they have not dared to fake this again in the last 40 years – and their new missions to the moon will be very interesting
Rating: 5 / 5
I received a copy of “What Happened on the Moon” directly from the producers as I gave David Percy and his assistant a tour of the Goldstone tracking facility and was interviewed on camera by David in December of 1997.
I worked at the Goldstone Manned Space Flight Network station during all Apollo missions and was an eyewitness to those historic events. However, this DVD is filled with half-truths and total fabrications about the Apollo program. It will only be of interest to people who like things about “Area 51,” “Crop Circles,” Roswell “UFO’s” and other weird “happenings.”
Anyone who has even the slightest knowledge of photography and physics can see through the so-called “facts” presented in this fabrication. It should be considered a work of fiction instead of an independent view of a historic achievement.
Bill Wood, Retired Tracking Systems Engineer, Barstow, CA
Rating: 1 / 5
I remember the entire race to the moon. I was convinced we had landed on the moon until a couple weeks ago when I saw the moon images for myself on the Navy’s own Clementine satellite images stored on their own website for public display.
Having been an executive level engineer for 30 years, it was a shock to find out the truth for myself. While videos, documentaries and websites can always twist information…. take a look directly at the moon itself. I highly recommend going onto the Navy’s own website and take a look at their moon satellite images, particularly around the extreme lunar north and south poles. There are mining operations, buildings, craft.. you name it and they are not ours. Some of the mining pits are a couple hundred miles across and you can see the mining in process. In some cases the Navy attempted to smudge out the large buildings but you can still see some of it. Others, they completely missed. Don’t take my word for it. Look for yourself. Use the regional images on the Clementine lunar browser, copy the images as a bmp format and blow them up 2x to 3x with a photo editor. Don’t bother with the close up images on the Navy’s site because they have deleted these files or substituted. However, you can still see the objects or interest in the area photos. (highest resolution)
After reading Phil Corso’s book “The Day After Roswell” where he described Nasa’s of alien bases on the moon during their first orbit to take photos, I found the Navy’s satellite image website to check the lunar area’s Corso described. He was absolutely correct. They are located right where he said.. and then some.
Don’t take anyone’s word for it. Look for yourself. It will take a few hours of scanning images for you to adjust your eyes to discerning particular objects in the rough terrain.
Don’t bother with the images on Nasa’s website. They did massive editing of the photos.
Rating: 4 / 5
THE PROBLEM IS THIS: 40+ YEARS (AND MILLIONS OF HOURS) OF MEDIA SAYING THE MOON LANDINGS WERE REAL, AND ONLY A FEW YEARS ARGUING AGAINST THEM.
So everyone coming to this film has had years of being told the official line. That’s a lot to compete with and a lot to flush out of the brain.
Just imagine if the USSR (Russia) had carried out the moon landing.
Imagine the dent in US national pride. Well if this film had then come along and accused the USSR of faking the landing.
The US support would have been in the majority – ‘of course Russia did not land on the moon’ everyone would have chorused.
The problem is that most people see such an historic event, an event that has come to be seen as ‘man’s’ greatest achievement, through political filters.
No if Russia had done it, becuase we don’t WANT them to have done,
or YES if the US did it, beacuse we’d WANT that.
Looking at the evidence presented in the films, and looking at the official responses, and debunking, the case for a faked moon landing is over the 1/2 way mark – so its more likely that it was faked than real.
I suggest you watch his films for yourself, and decide for yourself, and try not to let any preconcieved ideas filter what you see.
An interesting fact: When the Soviets managed to build a system that could track rockets from the earth to the moon, the remaining 3 Apollo missions were all suddenley cancelled.
Rating: 5 / 5